In looking up something unrelated, I stumbled into this 2010 British Journal of Pharmocology article. You don’t have to read it, I’ll tell you why it’s bullshit.

It’s the first sentence in the abstract, that’s why. It reads:

Female sexual arousal consists of a number of physiological responses resulting from increased genital blood.

Aaaaaaaand, that’s why the pharmceutical industry is stupid.

See yesterday’s post for details.

Happy Friday everybody. Have a funny condom commercial:

More in "pink pill"
medicating opinion

I have talked on and on and on and, indeed, on about the medicalization of women's sexual dysfunction....

the doctor is in

Now here's something you might not expect me to feel ambivalent about: it's the New York Times reporting...